David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There were some discussions about whether it made sense for the kernel > to support the behavior required by the RFC. Other comments debated the > wisdom of using a tightly targeted patch specific to the RFC, or whether > a more general but intrusive solution would be better.
I think we've made it quite clear what needs to be done for it to be accepted. All that remains is for someone to implement it. If anyone really cares about this, then please write the code instead of talking about it. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
