David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Probably a better way to handle this is to correct the > INDATAGRAMS value by decrementing it when we notice that > the checksum is incorrect in a deferred manner.
I think sunrpc should instead increment the appropriate counters directly as otherwise checksum errors won't be recorded correctly for sunrpc packets. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
