On Tue, 2006-20-06 at 03:04 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > > You are still speaking ATM (and the above may still be valid), but: > > Could you for example look at the netdevice->type and from that figure > > out the link layer overhead and compensate for it. > > Obviously a lot more useful if such activity is doable in user space > > without any knowledge of the kernel? and therefore zero change to the > > kernel and everything then becomes forward and backward compatible. > > It would be nice to have support for HFSC as well, which unfortunately > needs to be done in the kernel since it doesn't use rate tables. > What about qdiscs like SFQ (which uses the packet size in quantum > calculations)? I guess it would make sense to use the wire-length > there as well.
Didnt even think of that ;-> Is it getting too complicated? BTW, I forgot to mention one thing on the bandwidth issue is we could do is send netlink events on link speed changes too; some listener somewhere would then do the adjustment. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
