Hi Jingju,

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:43:08 +0800 wrote:

> The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
> So pass the calls to the PHY
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou <houji...@marvell.com>
> ---
> Since v1:
> - using phy_dev member in struct net_device

I noticed that you send a new v2 patch. So this patch should be ignored.
Some tips:

*the v2 patch title should be like:

[PATCH v2] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get_wol

*you also add a commit msg in v2, you'd better mention it
in changes since v1.

Thanks,
Jisheng

> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index e05e227..78869fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -3908,6 +3908,25 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device 
> *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +mvneta_ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> +     wol->supported = 0;
> +     wol->wolopts = 0;
> +
> +     if (dev->phy_dev)
> +             return phy_ethtool_get_wol(dev->phy_dev, wol);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +mvneta_ethtool_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> +     if (!dev->phy_dev)
> +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +     return phy_ethtool_set_wol(dev->phy_dev, wol);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct net_device_ops mvneta_netdev_ops = {
>       .ndo_open            = mvneta_open,
>       .ndo_stop            = mvneta_stop,
> @@ -3937,6 +3956,8 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device 
> *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
>       .set_rxfh       = mvneta_ethtool_set_rxfh,
>       .get_link_ksettings = phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings,
>       .set_link_ksettings = mvneta_ethtool_set_link_ksettings,
> +     .get_wol        = mvneta_ethtool_get_wol,
> +     .set_wol        = mvneta_ethtool_set_wol,
>  };
>  
>  /* Initialize hw */

Reply via email to