On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 09:36:11PM +0000, Mintz, Yuval wrote: > I might have gotten it all wrong, but I was under the assumption that time- > stamped packets are periodic, and that the interval between two isn't > going to be so small.
That is an incorrect assumption. Consider the Delay_Req packets arriving on a port in the MASTER state. > Is so, how does having a couple of additional instructions in between > jeopardizes the next time stamp? It is not just about the few instructions, but there is also preemption possible. Thanks, Richard
