On 02/05/2017 08:52 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> +static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g2_watchdog_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id) >>> +{ >>> + u16 reg; >>> + >>> + struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = dev_id; >>> + >>> + mv88e6xxx_g2_read(chip, GLOBAL2_WDOG_CONTROL, ®); >>> + >>> + dev_info(chip->dev, "Watchdog event: %04x", reg); >> >> Should this be 0x%04x just to illustrate the value is hexadecimal? And > > Yes, the prefix would make sense. > >> should this be dev_info_once()? > > Since the next action is to disable the interrupt, and there is no > code path to reenable it, _once does not seem needed. And if for some > reason the kernel log is spammed with these messages, i want to > know. It means my interrupt handling code is badly broken!
Sure, that makes sense then, thanks! -- Florian