On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Tom Tucker wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:46 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:54:37 -0700 > > > > > In any case I think we need to find a way for Linux to support iWARP > > > hardware, since there are users that want this, and (some of) the > > > vendors are working hard to do things the right way (including cc'ing > > > netdev on the conversation). I don't think it's good for Linux for > > > the answer to just be, "sorry, you're wrong to want to use that hardware." > > > > We give the same response for TOE stuff. > > What does the word "we" represent in this context? Is it the Linux > community at large, Linux and Andrew, you? I'm not trying to be > argumentative, I just want to understand how carefully and by whom iWARP > technology has been considered.
$ grep -ri davem /usr/src/linux - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
