[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:52:24 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >>Some changes in the patchset based on James Morris' comments over the >>weekend, in >>addition I rebased the patchset against 2.6.18-rc2. > > Minor comment - can you start posting these with Subject: lines that > say something like: > > Subject: [Patch X/Y] NetLabel-VNN: > > Where 'NN' gets incremented each time you post? I almost got myself a > patch set in my "to look at" queue that was half Friday's and half today's, > and no good could have come from that. And yes, it's *ok* if Friday's was > -v14 and today is -v15, if we're making progress towards merge-able code.. ;) > > (Venkat - I'm cc'ing you as I've seen the same thing with MLSXFRM > patchsets)... >
Sure. Unless the patchset gets accepted it it's current form (a guy can dream can't he?) I'll mark the next round as "NetLabel-v1". -- paul moore linux security @ hp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
