On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > Thinking it over I'm still not completely happy with this. A > small subset of all the validation tasks is simply too complex > to be put into the policy. The validation of your type value > array is such a case, address fields with variable length based > on their family is another. I think it's just not worth to > blow up struct nla_policy by 12 bytes per entry just to save > some code.
Alright, I can instead just add the validation function call wherever that attribute is going to be used. Just thought it might be nice to have this generically, I'm not really too attached to it :) I'll change it in the next nl80211 iteration. johannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
