On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 17:11 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:02:20AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > It seems to be a valid use case to add xfrm state without
> > Security Parameter Indexes (SPI) value associated:
> > ip xfrm state add src $src dst $dst proto $proto mode $mode sel src
> > $src dst $dst $algo
> >
> > The bad thing is that it's currently impossible to get/delete the
> > state
> > without SPI: __xfrm_state_insert() obviously doesn't add hash for
> > zero
> > SPI in xfrm.state_byspi, and xfrm_user_state_lookup() will fail as
> > xfrm_state_lookup() does lookups by hash.
> >
> > It also isn't possible to workaround from userspace as
> > xfrm_id_proto_match() will be always true for ah/esp/comp protos.
> >
> > So, don't try looking up by hash if SPI == 0.
> >
> > Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <d...@arista.com>
>
> A zero SPI is illegal for many IPsec protocols because that value
> is used for other purposes, e.g., IKE encapsulation.
But still it's possible to create ipsec with zero SPI.
And it seems not making sense to search for a state with SPI hash if
request has zero SPI.
--
Dima
