On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:31:13AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:

>       Based on the feedback, I formally request you to back out all
> of WE-21 from 2.6.19. Rationale : it's probably too early. You can
> keep it for a later date if you wish.

Jean,

What about a patch like the one below?  It tries to detect WE-20
ESSID/NICKN accesses and adjust them to WE-21 style.  What am
I missing?

I haven't had a chance to test it yet -- just hacked it
up...YMMV... :-)

John

diff --git a/net/core/wireless.c b/net/core/wireless.c
index ffff0da..ba5fe77 100644
--- a/net/core/wireless.c
+++ b/net/core/wireless.c
@@ -748,11 +748,39 @@ #endif    /* WE_SET_EVENT */
                int     extra_size;
                int     user_length = 0;
                int     err;
+               int     essid_compat = 0;
 
                /* Calculate space needed by arguments. Always allocate
                 * for max space. Easier, and won't last long... */
                extra_size = descr->max_tokens * descr->token_size;
 
+               /* Check need for ESSID compatibility for WE < 21 */
+               switch (cmd) {
+               case SIOCSIWESSID:
+               case SIOCGIWESSID:
+               case SIOCSIWNICKN:
+               case SIOCGIWNICKN:
+                       if (iwr->u.data.length == descr->max_tokens + 1)
+                               essid_compat = 1;
+                       else if (IW_IS_SET(cmd)) {
+                               char essid[IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE + 1];
+
+                               err = copy_from_user(essid, iwr->u.data.pointer,
+                                                    iwr->u.data.length *
+                                                    descr->token_size);
+                               if (err)
+                                       return -EFAULT;
+
+                               if (essid[iwr->u.data.length] == '\0')
+                                       essid_compat = 1;
+                       }
+                       break;
+               default:
+                       break;
+               }
+
+               iwr->u.data.length -= essid_compat;
+
                /* Check what user space is giving us */
                if(IW_IS_SET(cmd)) {
                        /* Check NULL pointer */
@@ -795,7 +823,8 @@ #ifdef WE_IOCTL_DEBUG
 #endif /* WE_IOCTL_DEBUG */
 
                /* Create the kernel buffer */
-               extra = kmalloc(extra_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+               /*    kzalloc ensures NULL-termination for essid_compat */
+               extra = kzalloc(extra_size, GFP_KERNEL);
                if (extra == NULL) {
                        return -ENOMEM;
                }
@@ -819,6 +848,8 @@ #endif      /* WE_IOCTL_DEBUG */
                /* Call the handler */
                ret = handler(dev, &info, &(iwr->u), extra);
 
+               iwr->u.data.length += essid_compat;
+
                /* If we have something to return to the user */
                if (!ret && IW_IS_GET(cmd)) {
                        /* Check if there is enough buffer up there */

-- 
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to