Hi Jose, On 10/09/2018 18:21, Jose Abreu wrote: > On 10-09-2018 16:49, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> Hi Jose, >> >> On 10/09/2018 16:44, Jose Abreu wrote: >>> On 10-09-2018 14:46, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>> hi Jose, >>>> >>>> On 10/09/2018 14:55, Jose Abreu wrote: >>>>> On 10-09-2018 13:52, Jose Abreu wrote: >>>>>> Can you please try attached follow-up patch ? >>>>> Oh, please apply the whole series otherwise this will not apply >>>>> cleanly. >>>> Indeed, it helps! >>>> >>>> With the fixups, it fails later, around 15s instead of 3, in RX and TX. >>> Thanks for testing Neil. What if we keep rearming the timer >>> whilst there are pending packets ? Something like in the attach. >>> (applies on top of previous one). >> It fixes RX, but TX fails after ~13s. > > Ok :( > > Can you please try attached follow-up patch ?
RX is still ok but now TX fails almost immediately... With 100ms report : $ iperf3 -c 192.168.1.47 -t 0 -p 5202 -R -i 0.1 Connecting to host 192.168.1.47, port 5202 Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.1.47 is sending [ 4] local 192.168.1.45 port 45900 connected to 192.168.1.47 port 5202 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-0.10 sec 10.9 MBytes 913 Mbits/sec [ 4] 0.10-0.20 sec 11.0 MBytes 923 Mbits/sec [ 4] 0.20-0.30 sec 6.34 MBytes 532 Mbits/sec [ 4] 0.30-0.40 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 4] 0.40-0.50 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 4] 0.50-0.60 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 4] 0.60-0.70 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 4] 0.70-0.80 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 4] 0.80-0.90 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 4] 0.90-1.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 4] 1.00-1.10 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec ^C[ 4] 1.10-1.10 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.10 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 4] 0.00-1.10 sec 28.2 MBytes 214 Mbits/sec receiver iperf3: interrupt - the client has terminated Neil > > I'm so sorry about this back and forth and I appreciate all your > help . > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Jose Miguel Abreu > > >> >> Neil >> >>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>> Jose Miguel Abreu >>> >
