On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:11:42 +0900 Chang-an Song <csong...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > - The original document has a copyright assertion but no associated > > license. Do we know what the license is? I assume it's something > > that is free and GPL-compatible, but that would be good to know for > > sure. > > 3. I asked to main author Daniel that apache 2.0 license for this document. That is a bit of a problem, since Apache v2 is not compatible with GPLv2. If the license of the document cannot be changed, I don't think we can accept it into the kernel tree. Thanks, jon
