On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 10:35 PM Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Maciej Żenczykowski <m...@google.com> > > This reverts commit 114aa35d06d4920c537b72f9fa935de5dd205260. > > By my understanding of kmemleak the reasoning for this patch > is incorrect. If kmemleak couldn't handle rcu we'd have it > reporting leaks all over the place. My belief is that this > was instead papering over a real leak.
If you have this belief, please: 1. Explain in details why you believe it or what supports it. For example, did you see any kernel memory continue growing? 2. You want to fix the comment right above __krealloc() before fixing anything else. Thanks.