On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 11:47 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:46:48 -0400 (EDT) > > > A 'flush' has a semantic implication that all entries will be removed, and > > it should be atomic and either succeed or fail at that granularity. > > Correct.
Fair enough, does it matter that we have no way to report failure back to users who can no longer assume success? -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html