Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To head off the criticism, I admit this is an oversimplification, and true > busy-waiters should be using cpu_relax(), which contains a barrier.
Why would you want to use cpu_relax()? That's there to waste time efficiently, isn't it? Shouldn't you be using smp_rmb() or something like that? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
