Yes, you are right.
What do you think about this:
For all packets can be sent out, we just disable
all things in sk_route_caps in ip_route_me_harder
diff -X linux-2.6.22.6/Documentation/dontdiff -pru
linux-2.6.22.6/net/ipv4/netfilter.c linux-2.6.22.6-lepton/net/ipv4/netfilter.c
--- linux-2.6.22.6/net/ipv4/netfilter.c 2007-09-14 17:41:18.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.22.6-lepton/net/ipv4/netfilter.c 2007-09-19 23:52:11.000000000
+0800
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ int ip_route_me_harder(struct sk_buff **
if ((*pskb)->dst->error)
return -1;
+ if((*pskb)->sk&&sk->sk_route_caps)
+ /* This is overkill, but it is safe and simple */
+ sk->sk_route_caps=0;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
if (!(IPCB(*pskb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED) &&
xfrm_decode_session(*pskb, &fl, AF_INET) == 0)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:17:17PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > lepton wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >> For local src packets, it is better to update sk_route_caps in
> >> ip_route_me_harder.
> >
> >
> >
> > This seems like a good idea to me. But why only for local src
> > (address) packets? This function can also be used for locally
> > generated packet that have been (f.i.) NATed to a foreign
> > address ...
>
>
> Actually, I'm afraid it might break some setups. Rerouting is
> done per packet, but if we cache the dst_entry for the socket,
> all packets from that socket will be routed similar.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
