From: David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:26:15 -0800
> Last I heard, there are Intellectual Property claims with ISATAP, > which is why the RFC is not standards track and which makes it > effectively a proprietary protocol. > > Unless that's been resolved, I think the claim by the IP owner is > that it can't be distributed without a license from them. So, maybe > not worth the effort for an experimental RFC. If this is the case, I agree, we cannot include ISATAP support in the kernel. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
