On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:44:29PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> Such situations (ASSERT_RTNL() in atomic context) have always
> been bugs though, and that continues to be true and I think
> the check should be added somehow.

OK once I've fixed the set_multicast path I'll do an audit of
the existing ASSERT_RTNL users and then add the might_sleep
check.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to