Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:11:44AM CEST, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>In flow_dissector set the flow label in flow_keys for IPv6. This also
>removes the shortcircuiting of flow dissection when a non-zero label
>is present, the flow label can be considered to provide additional
>entropy for a hash.
>
>Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>
>---
> include/net/flow_dissector.h | 4 +++-
> net/core/flow_dissector.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/flow_dissector.h b/include/net/flow_dissector.h
>index 08480fb..effe607 100644
>--- a/include/net/flow_dissector.h
>+++ b/include/net/flow_dissector.h
>@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ struct flow_dissector_key_basic {
> };
>
> struct flow_dissector_key_tags {
>- u32 vlan_id:12;
>+ u32 vlan_id:12,
>+ flow_label:20;
> };
>
> /**
>@@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ enum flow_dissector_key_id {
> FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS, /* struct flow_dissector_key_eth_addrs */
> FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_TIPC_ADDRS, /* struct flow_dissector_key_tipc_addrs
> */
> FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_VLANID, /* struct flow_dissector_key_flow_tags */
>+ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_FLOW_LABEL, /* struct flow_dissector_key_flow_label
>*/
I think it makes sense to pair FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_* with
struct flow_dissector_key_*
How about to have FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_TAGS istead of VLANID and FLOW_LABEL?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
