From: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0200
> I'm not saying it is not possible, it certainly is. But I think that > for example rocker internals have no value to default user, he > should not care and he cannot find out what is going on there > without knowledge or rocker.c code. The question is, do we need some > standard interface to expose random debugging data? I don't think > so, I think that debugfs is exactly the tool to be used in that > case. If it is only interesting to rocker.c maintainer, he can keep a local patch he applies when he needs such a facility. This discussion is becomming circular. If it's useful, it needs a well defined interface. If it's not useful, it doesn't belong in the tree. Therefore, debugfs is useless. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
