Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:36:03AM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> >Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0200 > >> I'm not saying it is not possible, it certainly is. But I think that >> for example rocker internals have no value to default user, he >> should not care and he cannot find out what is going on there >> without knowledge or rocker.c code. The question is, do we need some >> standard interface to expose random debugging data? I don't think >> so, I think that debugfs is exactly the tool to be used in that >> case. > >If it is only interesting to rocker.c maintainer, he can keep a local >patch he applies when he needs such a facility. > >This discussion is becomming circular. > >If it's useful, it needs a well defined interface. > >If it's not useful, it doesn't belong in the tree. > >Therefore, debugfs is useless.
Fair enough. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
