On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:08:59AM -0700, Derrik Pates wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > > The plan is to get newnat as fast as possible into 2.4.x. > > > > This means that all old conntrack/nat helper do no longer work. I have > > moved the old helpers to a new 'oldnat' repository in patch-o-matic. > > So is the newnat13 patch even intended to patch against 2.4.18? I've > tried patching it against a clean 2.4.18 tree, and I get several patch > failures (include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_conntrack.h, > net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile, and several of > net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_*.c). I'd like to be able to implement > the H.323 conntrack feature (I have a couple users who desperately want > to use NetMeeting), but the last time I tried (a couple days ago, with > the 2.4.18 kernel + newnat8 + h323 conntrack patches), it proceeded to > Oops within minutes of boot (that was after hand-patching some of the > stuff).
I don't know what kind of problems you are experiencing. I can successfully patch,compile and run without any problems: - all 'submitted' patches - newnat13 - h323 - talk - tftp - pptp - helper - and almost everything else from base Maybe you should delete your whole patch-o-matic and do re-checkout from CVS.. I've had another user bug report where somehow the local CVS tree got corrupted. > Derrik Pates | Sysadmin, Douglas School | #linuxOS on EFnet > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | District (dsdk12.net) | #linuxOS on OPN -- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)
