One arrived back to me, but not all. It appears that I can recieve mauil
from net man, but a few times when I sent on a question I got nothing back.
Peter Gormley
From: "David Barr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Possible problems with sending messages
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:02:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mrcproxy.mountcollyer.belb.net ([212.250.189.121]) by
bay0-mc1-f11.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 26
May 2006 06:02:57 -0700
Received: from mail.belb.org.uk (mail.mountcollyer.belb.net
[10.50.50.202])by mrcproxy.mountcollyer.belb.net (Postfix) with SMTP id
A8FEB8E5A8;Fri, 26 May 2006 13:30:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from belb.co.uk by mail.belb.org.uk with SMTP; Fri, 26 May 2006
14:01:05 +0100
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3bXaqRllOrvKY+klE4U1SsYBo28qze7r0=
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Possible problems with sending messages
Thread-Index: AcZ/3SVU1CMVjuPERC66IAMriHV/eQA5vCYg
Precedence: List
X-LR-SENT-TO: mrcproxy.mountcollyer.belb.net
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2006 13:02:57.0858 (UTC)
FILETIME=[B5CB4220:01C680C4]
Can I just check Peter, you sent messages to netman. Where they they
resent to you (and other netman subscribers - i.e. posted to netman)?
With the From: line reading something like From netman "on behalf of;
Peter Gormley"
If this is the case the server is working correctly.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Peter Gormley
Sent: 25 May 2006 10:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Possible problems with sending messages
Yes I have sent a few and no replies
Peter Gormley
From: "David Barr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Possible problems with sending messages
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:26:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mrcproxy.mountcollyer.belb.net ([212.250.189.121]) by
bay0-mc8-f7.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu,
25
May 2006 01:26:30 -0700
Received: from mail.belb.org.uk (mail.mountcollyer.belb.net
[10.50.50.202])by mrcproxy.mountcollyer.belb.net (Postfix) with SMTP id
B988A8E5A8;Thu, 25 May 2006 08:54:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from belb.co.uk by mail.belb.org.uk with SMTP; Thu, 25 May
2006
09:24:40 +0100
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3VbDxM6KH9W4zriJeIKq7yR0274rn1gGg=
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Possible problems with sending messages
Thread-Index:
AcV3AmR6KLnn1ubUQbmJ5m/PRk8WLQFkTgPAQEV56SwAY0QcQAAAeomAAALZHqAAJCzkgA==
Precedence: List
X-LR-SENT-TO: mrcproxy.mountcollyer.belb.net
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 May 2006 08:26:31.0106 (UTC)
FILETIME=[ECE80220:01C67FD4]
Have you had some problems with sending messages to the discussion
server Gerald. If you provide a little more detail I'll look into it.
Has anyone else experienced problems sending messages to the list ?
David
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of G FALOON
Sent: 24 May 2006 16:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Netman Review - Should it continue?
yes keep the list going... provided that all messages sent on it
actually arrive!
Gerald
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of J Cleland
Sent: 24 May 2006 14:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Netman Review - Should it continue?
So would I.
Best regards,
James Cleland
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of M Smith
Sent: 24 May 2006 14:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Netman Review - Should it continue?
Yes, have found it very helpful and would like to see it
continue.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of P McCormick
Sent: 22 May 2006 15:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Netman Review - Should it continue?
Yes, keep going!!
Pat
________________________________
From: [email protected] on behalf of David Barr
Sent: Wed 29/06/2005 11:19
To: [email protected]
Subject: Netman Review - Should it continue?
I am trying to gauge the support provided under the netman
banner.
I would be most interested to hear your comments on those areas
of the C2K/L2K netman support (online and offline) if you think it
should continue?
Background to this review:
A year ago, at the ICT Coordinators Seminar held on Wednesday
23rd June 2004, it was agreed to set up the netman forum to:
* Act as a forum to formulate ideas and act as a Schools'
Advocate.
* Provide increased information flow between schools
* Share good practice
* Share problems and solutions
We also agreed to review this in in a year and that time has now
come around.
I will post a number of questions to netman in the next few days
to gauge you views on the Strengths and Weaknesses of the forum and to
ask for your comments. I'll prefix the postings with "Netman Review" to
distinguish the review from other discussions. e.g.. "Netman Review -
Strengths", "Netman Review - Weaknesses" etc.
We will base our decisions of the future of netman on your
comments.
Some statistics to begin - number of members 72, over 80% of
schools represented, number of messages posted to date 466.
David
David P Barr
Assistant Advisory Officer (IT)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mountcollyer Resource Centre
111-113 Limestone Road
Belfast
BT15 3AB
Tel: (028) 90 352435
Fax: (028) 90 352272
Web: <http://www.belb.org.uk <http://www.belb.org.uk/> >
BELB Inset Programme: <http://www.belb.org.uk/inset>
Headquarters:
40 Academy Street
Belfast, BT1 2NQ
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:
This message is confidential. You should not copy it or disclose
its contents to anyone without the express written consent of the
author. You may use and apply the information only for the intended
purpose. Internet communications are not secure and therefore author
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
If this email has come to you in error please delete it and any
attachments. If you accept this email you are agreeing to the conditions
above. If you do not agree with these conditions please delete the
message and attachments and inform the author of your objections.
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for
Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed are those of the individual and not the
school.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the school
does
not accept legal responsibility for the content of this message.
If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
user
responsible for delivering this communication to the intended
recipient,
you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or
copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.
________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed are those of the individual and not the
school.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the school
does
not accept legal responsibility for the content of this message.
If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
user
responsible for delivering this communication to the intended
recipient,
you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or
copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for
Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed are those of the individual and not the school.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the school does
not accept legal responsibility for the content of this message. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the user
responsible for delivering this communication to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.
------------------------------- o O o
---------------------------------------
Further resources in support of BELB schools using C2K and L2K (Legacy)
networks are available from the board's website at
www.belb.org.uk/teachers/c2k
If you wish to receive weekly digest versions of the messages, send the
following command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe digest netman
To unsubscribe visit the following address:
http://www.belb.org.uk/teachers/Unsubscribe
or send the following command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe netman
------------------------------- o O o
---------------------------------------
Further resources in support of BELB schools using C2K and L2K (Legacy)
networks are available from the board's website at
www.belb.org.uk/teachers/c2k
If you wish to receive weekly digest versions of the messages, send the
following command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe digest netman
To unsubscribe visit the following address:
http://www.belb.org.uk/teachers/Unsubscribe
or send the following command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe netman
------------------------------- o O o
---------------------------------------
Further resources in support of BELB schools using C2K and L2K (Legacy)
networks are available from the board's website at
www.belb.org.uk/teachers/c2k
If you wish to receive weekly digest versions of the messages, send the
following command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe digest netman
To unsubscribe visit the following address:
http://www.belb.org.uk/teachers/Unsubscribe
or send the following command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe netman
