> On 21 May 2015, at 16:50, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka <lho...@nic.cz> wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2015, at 16:42, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka <lho...@nic.cz> wrote: >>>> RFC 6020 also states that must and when expessions are XPath 1.0, and >>>> we are moving away from it. >>> >>> No we are not moving away from XPath 1.0. XPath 1.0 allows you to specify >>> a function library - in fact, it *requires* you to do this - and we >>> use the core function + some more. >> >> Well, but RFC 6020 states: >> >> o The function library is the core function library defined in >> [XPATH], and a function "current()" that returns a node set with >> the initial context node. >> >> Introducing new functions certainly affects implementors. > > Absolutely. But we're not moving away from XPath 1.0.
Yes, sorry, this was my wrong formulation. Lada > > > /martin -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
