Hi Lada,

FWIW, I have a few general question/comment on the draft, for which it might be 
useful to add clarification:


-          The general approach appears to be that metadata generally needs to 
be defined as part of the module, and when it is, must be supported.  How about 
augmenting an existing model with metadata "after" the fact (i.e. after the 
original definition)?  This appears to be potentially a more common usage in 
practice.  It would be useful to comment on expected usage, and perhaps add an 
example in which an existing model is augmented with metadata (or at least 
allude to the fact that this is a possibility).

-          How does metadata show up in regular operations - how is it modified 
and retrieved; how is it being populated?  I think it would also be helpful to 
add a section that illustrates usage of metadata. I was surprised to e.g. not 
see "default" as a substatement; is this something that should be added?

--- Alex

From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 6:14 AM
To: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 
(until 2015-06-29)


All,

Today is the cutoff date for the Last Call for this draft, but the author 
indicated that comments received today or tomorrow can be incorporated into the 
draft-update being worked on.  So, if you have any lingering reviews, please 
send them before as soon as possible.

Thanks!
Kent



From: Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net<mailto:kwat...@juniper.net>>
Date: Monday, June 15, 2015 at 6:49 PM
To: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" 
<netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 
2015-06-29)


This is a notice to start a NETMOD WG last call for the document "Defining and 
Using Metadata with YANG":

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01

Please indicate your support by Monday June 29, 2015 at 9PM EST.
We are not only interested in receiving defect reports, we are equally
interested in statements of the form:

  "I have reviewed I-D XYZ and I found no issues"
  "I have implemented the data model in I-D XYZ"
  "I am implementing the data model in I-D XYZ"
  "I am considering to implement the data model in I-D XYZ"

This is the first Last Call for this document.

Kent, as NETMOD co-chair

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to