We've posted a new version of our draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01
It includes a section on the issues that were raised and our observation/comment. It also adds a detailed section on terminology based on the interim calls, and updates the operational requirements with further details. thanks. -- Anees On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Nadeau Thomas <tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote: > > > > One of the actions from the last Interim meeting was to have both > > sides of the issues around the open config approach to create at > least > > slides/textual bullet points for use during our discussion in > Praha so > > we can come to a conclusion around the final issues. We need these > > slides/bullet points to be listed on the list here and continue the > > discussion here BEFORE the Praha meeting. I’d like to ask Anees > and > > Rob to write up their side of the story. As I recall Juergen, > Kent, > > Martin and Andy were the most vocal around the other side of > things, > > so I would like to ask them to write up their side of things. Can > you > > all please confirm your acceptance of this action and a target for > > when you will post the issues? > > We have posted our thoughts in this draft: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-openconfig-reply-00 > > > /martin > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
