thats a good start. lets please discuss the merits and pros/cons vs the open cconfig proposal.
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Nadeau Thomas <tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote: >> >> One of the actions from the last Interim meeting was to have both >> sides of the issues around the open config approach to create at least >> slides/textual bullet points for use during our discussion in Praha so >> we can come to a conclusion around the final issues. We need these >> slides/bullet points to be listed on the list here and continue the >> discussion here BEFORE the Praha meeting. I’d like to ask Anees and >> Rob to write up their side of the story. As I recall Juergen, Kent, >> Martin and Andy were the most vocal around the other side of things, >> so I would like to ask them to write up their side of things. Can you >> all please confirm your acceptance of this action and a target for >> when you will post the issues? > > We have posted our thoughts in this draft: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-openconfig-reply-00 > > > /martin > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
