> On 26 Jul 2015, at 12:55, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > Any are concrete actionable proposals?
Start rewriting 6020bis, but only if we decide to go that way - it is a difficult decision. I will be slightly in favor of doing so. Lada > > /js > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:46:22PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 26 Jul 2015, at 02:26, Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The WG should decide what it means for YANG to not >>> be NETCONF-specific. Why does YANG define extensions >>> to NETCONF operations (like insert)? IMO the normative text >>> about NETCONF should not be in the YANG RFC. >>> >> >> This is essentially what I proposed in Berlin (IETF 87): >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-netmod >> >> (first item in Open mike section). >> >> Another thing that I realized only recently is that some properties that are >> inherent to the conceptual data tree are defined in “XML Mapping” sections. >> >> I think most YANG concepts and statements can be defined in terms of data >> tree properties. Separate documents would then define different encodings, >> and “profiles” for management protocols. >> >> It would need massive changes in 6020bis text though. >> >> Lada >> >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> -- >> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs >> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
