On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:55:03PM -0400, Nadeau Thomas wrote: > > Juergen is technically correct, although conversations with the AD > have started about adjusting our charter to facilitate a 2.0 rev of > Yang. If you have input/opinions around whether or not we should > embark on this, I suggest sending a note to Benoit.
Sorry, any such debate belongs into the WG first. I do not recall having seen a WG charter to put up a revision of something on the charter where the current revision of the same thing is not even complete. The process you run is really backwards. The process usually is roughly this: - some people publish individual I-Ds - the WG discusses these individual I-Ds - the WG forms and opinion whether the work should be taken on - if the work does not fit the current charter, the WG consults with the AD concerning a charter revision Tom, it seems you are mostly running this backwards if you start with a private charter revision discussion with the respective AD. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
