> On 09 Sep 2015, at 08:28, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka <lho...@nic.cz> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Andy argued that the proposed new definition of data tree looks like it >> is a big tree containing everything, so here is another try, >> improvements are welcome: >> >> o data tree: An instantiated tree of any data modeled with YANG, i.e., >> one of: configuration, state data, combined configuration and state >> data, RPC input, RPC output, notification. > > Looks good to me, with s/RPC/RPC or action/g
Sure, I forgot about actions. Also, do we want to make provisions for using YANG outside this narrow scope, as it has been already done a few times? If so, we could change s/i.e., one of:/for example/ Lada > > > /martin -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
