Re: [netmod] opstate-reqs #3: Is there a requirement for asynchronous systems to provide a blocking config update?

[Kent Watsen]

> Big confusion here. NETCONF/RESTCONF is synchronous not asynchronous.
> Did you messes up the terms throughout this paragraph? If I swap all
> of them, the text starts to make sense to me.

Nope, but I grant you there are terminology issues here.  What I mean, and have 
said before, is that NETCONF/RESTCONF make no assertions with regard to the 
applied configuration when the RPC-reply or HTTP response is provided.   In my 
experience, only the control plane is updated and sometime later the changes 
are propagated to dataplane. 

Kent
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod