On 9/23/15, 3:24 AM, "Ladislav Lhotka" <lho...@nic.cz> wrote:
>> >> "I have reviewed I-D XYZ and I found no issues" >> "I have implemented the data model in I-D XYZ" >> "I am implementing the data model in I-D XYZ" >> "I am considering to implement the data model in I-D XYZ² > >I believe the last three item should be about implementing the encoding >rather than ³the data model². True, this text was just copied/pasted from the previos LC on this draft, which then was copied/pasted from another LC. Making these options specific to this draft: "I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-05 and I found no issues" "I have implemented the encoding defined in draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-05" "I am implementing the encoding defined draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-05" "I am considering to implement the encoding defined in draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-05² Of course, these are merely suggestions, folks can provide comments in any form that suits them. Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
