Hi, William Lupton <w...@cantab.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sure there's an obvious reason for this, but could someone explain why > these functions need a separate module-name argument rather than just using > that module's prefix on the identity-name argument?
The only reason is that there are no existing functions that take a prefixed string as an argument. I think it would be possible to change these functions to take just two arguments, but I am not sure it is worth it? /martin > > For example, I saw derived-from(x, "ex-module", "foo") in a recent message > but (assuming that "ex" is the prefix for "ex-module") will this always be > the same as derived-from(x, "ex:foo")? > > Thanks, > William _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
