Hi,
I'd like to resolve this issue. Here is a complete example (valid, I believe):
module context {
namespace "http://example.com/context";;
prefix ctx;
leaf foo {
config false;
type uint32;
}
rpc oper {
output {
must "/foo mod foo = 0";
leaf foo {
type uint32;
}
}
}
}
1. What does the accessible tree look like?
2. What is the context node for the "must" expression?
Thanks, Lada
Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> writes:
> Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Y02-01 allows "must" as a substatement of "input", "output" and
>> "notification" but for these cases the specification of the context
>> node in sec. 7.5.3 doesn't work.
>>
>> o The context node is the node in the accessible tree for which the
>> "must" statement is defined.
>
> You are right. But note how the accessible tree is defined. There is
> a node for the operation / notification. This node should be the
> context node:
>
> o If the "must" statement is a substatement of a "notification"
> statement, the context node is the node representing the
> notification in the accessible tree.
>
> o If the "must" statement is a substatement of a "input"
> statement, the context node is the node representing the
> operation in the accessible tree.
>
> o If the "must" statement is a substatement of a "output"
> statement, the context node is the node representing the
> operation in the accessible tree.
>
>
> /martin
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
