> On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:34, Nadeau Thomas <tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote: > > > NETMOD: > > The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the > IETF Entity module have asked that the working group considerthe ietf-entity > YANG module > (currently https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-entitydt-netmod-entity/ > which is > still in individual draft status) as a working group item. > > Should we move to adopt draft-entitydt-netmod-entity as a WG item and > correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment by > Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will > gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document.
I would strongly prefer to finish the existing items first, or at least the critical ones on which other work depends. Adding more items would mean that both old and new items receive less attention on the average. We already have at most one or two reviews per WGLC, and this is IMO insufficient. Lada > > —Tom > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
