Dear all,
On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:34, Nadeau Thomas <tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote:
NETMOD:
The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the
IETF Entity module have asked that the working group considerthe ietf-entity
YANG module
(currently https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-entitydt-netmod-entity/ which
is
still in individual draft status) as a working group item.
Should we move to adopt draft-entitydt-netmod-entity as a WG item and
correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment by
Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will
gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document.
Support.
I would strongly prefer to finish the existing items first, or at least the
critical ones on which other work depends. Adding more items would mean that
both old and new items receive less attention on the average. We already have
at most one or two reviews per WGLC, and this is IMO insufficient.
While I understand the concern of work prioritization, one of the issues
in NETMOD is that we need to grow the number of people involved in
participating/editing/reviewing, and I'm happy to see Dan and Jimmy
taking the lead here.
Regards, Benoit
Lada
—Tom
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
