I have no nor know of any IPR Claims against this document.

        —Tom (speaking as an individual contributor)



> On Dec 16, 2015:8:13 AM, at 8:13 AM, Nadeau Thomas <tnad...@lucidvision.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> This mail starts the IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-01.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-01?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
> 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
> email explicitly regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
> IPR.
> The response needs to be sent to the NETMOD WG mailing list.  The document
> will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from 
> each
> author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the NETMOD WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR 
> that
> has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Kent and Tom, NETMOD WG Chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to