I have no nor know of any IPR Claims against this document.
On 12/16/15, 8:53 AM, "netmod on behalf of Robert Wilton" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of rwil...@cisco.com> wrote: >I have no nor know of any IPR Claims against this document. > >Thanks, >Rob > > >On 16/12/2015 13:13, Nadeau Thomas wrote: >> This mail starts the IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-01. >> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-01? >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see >> RFCs >> 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this >> email explicitly regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant >> IPR. >> The response needs to be sent to the NETMOD WG mailing list. The document >> will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from >> each >> author and contributor. >> >> If you are on the NETMOD WG email list but are not listed as an author or >> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR >> that >> has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Kent and Tom, NETMOD WG Chairs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> . >> > >_______________________________________________ >netmod mailing list >netmod@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
