On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:16:43AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 07 Jan 2016, at 10:07, Juergen Schoenwaelder
> > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:59:01AM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/7/16 9:23 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >>> This does not answer why input-interface is of type string...
> >>
> >> To be perfectly clear you seek that type string be replaced with
> >> interface-ref?
> >>
> >
> > I think for this leaf the type of choice would be interface-state-ref
> > unless there are strong reasons to use something opaque.
>
> Unfortunately, this is impossible because configuration leafrefs cannot refer
> to leafs in state data.
>
The problem is that the config true on input-interface is perhaps an
error given the description:
leaf input-interface {
type string;
description
"Packet was received on this interface.";
}
This sounds to me like state data.
> Should this CLR be removed? IMO, yes.
No.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
