I think we discussed at one of the previous IETFs that we will use
YANG 1.1 in the IETF once it is published. Please check the archives.
If I am correct, then you would have to be fast with finishing the ACL
model.

/js

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:16:40PM +0100, Dean Bogdanovic wrote:
> Are there any other opinions on switching YANG version for ACL model from 1.0 
> to 1.1? Would like to get more opinions on this, besides Martin.
> 
> Dean
> 
> > On Jan 8, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Dean Bogdanovic <ivand...@gmail.com <mailto:ivand...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Jan 8, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
> >>> <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:52:37PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >>>> Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:21:42PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> With YANG 1.1, a leafref can be marked as "require-instance false",
> >>>>>> which allows a interface-state-ref to be used in config:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>  type if:interface-state-ref {
> >>>>>>    require-instance false;
> >>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>  // + add description that explains what happens if there is no such
> >>>>>>  //   instance
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> (NOTE: this doesn't work w/ pyang at the momement, I am working on a
> >>>>>> fix)
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> And it would have to be if:interface-ref instead
> >>>>> if:interface-state-ref
> >>>>> I think.
> >>>> 
> >>>> No, I meant interface-state-ref.  This way you can put a filter on
> >>>> non-configured interfaces.
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> But with require-instance false, this is also true for
> >>> if:interface-ref.  If I preconfigure and interface, I might also want
> >>> to preconfigure ACLs refering the preconfigure interface. And note
> >>> that if:interface-state-ref refers to a config false leaf.
> >> 
> >> In this case we have to change to yang-version 1.1. The plan was to
> >> have it for 1.0. Do we want to move the ACL model to YANG minimum
> >> version 1.1?
> > 
> > I think it is ok.  We're fixing issues like this one in 1.1 so that we
> > don't have to rely on various workarounds.  Note that the second WGLC
> > for 1.1 just ended, w/ mostly minor proposed edits.
> > 
> > 
> > /martin
> 

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to