[retry] Martin,
On 2/8/2016 3:42 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote: >> Martin, >> Thanks for the response. See below. >> >> On 2/8/2016 1:57 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote: > [...] > >>>> But it's >>>> also clear that some in the WG would prefer Option 2 (and most/all of >>>> these are its coauthors.) >>> This was the preferred solution of the room in Yokohama. 2 of the 4 >>> authors were present. >> sure. And we know that the IETF consensus is not judged by who is in >> the room. It is of course useful information to the WG and the chairs. > You wrote "most/all of [those who prefer option 2] are its coauthors". I was referring to the on-list discussion, but fair point. But keep in mind that an in-person meeting isn't an authoritative source of WG consensus from the IETF process standpoint. > My observation was that just 2 of the coauthors were in the room, and > still this was the preferred solution; thus I think that your > statement that I quoted is incorrect. > okay, let me modify my comment: OLD and most/all of these are its coauthors NEW at very least its coauthors Lou > /martin > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
