JOEY BOYD <joey.b...@adtran.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In RFC6087, there's a statement under Lifecycle Management regarding > the revision date of a module with respect to its submodules. > > "If submodules are used, then the document containing the main module > MUST be updated so that the main module revision date is equal or more > recent than the revision date of any submodule that is (directly or > indirectly) included by the main module." > > In the Broadband Forum, we weren't aware of this statement until our > models were validated using another tool besides pyang which flagged > an error as our main modules' revision dates were older than some of > their submodules. We were wondering why pyang does not check for this > when using the --lint option as it seems to validate RFC6087 > requirements. Is this just an oversight or are we interpreting > something incorrectly?
An oversight in the tool. [Please report this as a bug at https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang] /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
