> On Feb 23, 2016:10:08 AM, at 10:08 AM, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > In yesterday's meeting, Lou (I think?) mentioned a use case for mount > that is not documented in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model; the need > for being able to specify modules to mount directly in the schema. > Something like this: > > container root { > ymnt:mount-point "lne" { > ymnt:mount-module "ietf-interfaces"; > } > } > > It would be useful if the use case for this could be described in more > details. Is it a requirement to be able to specify this in the > schema, or could it be done (as Chris mentioned) in the RFC text? > > The reason I ask is that it is probably not as simple as the example > above. First, you probably need to specify a revision of the module > to be mounted. Or a min-revision. Then probably a set of features > that must be enabled. And so on. It turns out that there is already > a proposal for specifying such a "conformance profile" - YANG Packages > (see draft-bierman-netmod-yang-package). Maybe it would be better to > re-use packages?
A question: is the point to manually/explicitly mount a specific container/s or the root of a device? I’d like to understand the use case better here too because, as you say, it can easily get complicated quickly. —Tom > > > /martin > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod