On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Hi, > > Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This > revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the > IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir > reviewers and to Martin for following up on the issues. Please check > the edits do make sure that nothing broke. The diff can be found > here: > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-13.txt > > Note that this is _not_ the time to raise new issues or to suggest > alternate resolutions to issues discussed before. This is only a check > to verify that the edits were done correctly. Please check the edits > as soon as possible, any errors found must be raised by Thursday > 2016-06-16.
I just finished my review of the changes. Things look pretty good to me. I found a little nit though: There is no ambiguity if both modules define the type, since there is no ambiguity. This sentence can likely be removed without loosing anything (but it also does not cause any harm). /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
