Dear Lou, as I stated earlier and some people agreed, I believe this document should be published as Informational RFC.
The reason I gave is below: > I see the DT document as a datastore solution proposal. There are different > gaps and issues which still need to be addressed and the solution proposal > needs yet to be > discussed and finalized. The document is providing information on the > history, explaining the need for a generic solution as well as is discussing > different scenarios. > As such I believe the datastore solution proposal from the DT should be > published with the intended status Informational RFC. I would like to recommend to change the intended status of the draft accordingly. Thanks, Mehmet -----Original Message----- From: Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 2:34 PM To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>; NetConf WG <netc...@ietf.org> Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-cha...@ietf.org>; NetConf WG Chairs <netconf-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: WG adoption poll draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00 All, This poll is closed and this document is adopted in the NETMOD WG. There have been many good topics raised during the call adoption call that we will work through. Kent and I are already working on a draft of the updated charter. Authors, Please resubmit your draft with the new name draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00 and with that and the date being the only change. Please consider how you want to track and resolve the topics/issues raised during the adoption call. WG trac and github issue tracker are available to you. Please also set a topic-specific Subject line in any list followup. -- Draft specific discussion can now be limited to just the netmod list. Thank you! Lou On 12/2/2016 4:26 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00 a NetMod working group > document. This document is unusual in that WG last call will be > jointly held in both the NetConf and NetMod WGs, while adoption and > day-to-day processing will take place in NetMod. > > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd > like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends December 16. > > Thank you, > NetConf and NetMod WG Chairs > > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
