So could “being writable” be associated with a feature (which might potentially apply to multiple such nodes)? W.
(and if so, what’s the cleanest way to achieve this? it seems that “if-feature” can’t be used with “config” but that it could be used by refining a grouping?) > On 22 Dec 2016, at 05:14, Randy Presuhn <randy_pres...@alumni.stanford.edu> > wrote: > > Hi - > > On 12/21/2016 6:56 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > ... >> This procedure would change how serial-num currently is handled. I >> don't have a strong opinion on this, but I note that serial-num is >> writable in the ENTITY-MIB. Maybe someone can comment on why it is >> writable in the MIB, and if this is a use case that we want to >> support? > > I *think* this is an example of what were known as "post-it note" > objects. Their values could be set by management action > to accommodate implementations in which, for example, the hardware > provided no way for software to access the information printed on an > inventory sticker affixed to a card. > > Randy > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
