On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:

> FYI - just slapped together and published:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-00
>
> Lou
>
> (as contributor)
>
> PS I'm happy with the definition being in 6780bis or in a standalone doc
> (as above), but really think we as a WG need to decide ASAP so as not to
> hold up 6780bis any further...
>
>
>

standalone doc is fine.

does this mean the contents of the tree diagram and the syntax for the
tree diagram are subject to WG consensus?


Andy


> On 3/13/2017 2:20 PM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > Would it make sense to update 6087bis section 4.4 to reference this new
> > pyang option for generated tree diagrams?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > On 11/03/2017 21:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >> "Acee Lindem (acee)" <a...@cisco.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi Juergen,
> >>>
> >>> On 3/8/17, 2:34 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
> >>> <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of
> >>> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
> >>>>> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this
> >>>>> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree`
> >>>>> and then manually edit from there).  What do you think?
> >>>>>
> >>>> Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not.
> >>> I frequently have to manually edit the pyang-generated trees to get
> them
> >>> to fit in the xml2rfc output. Is there a work around for this that I
> donĀ¹t
> >>> know about?
> >> In the latest pyang, I have added --tree-line-length.  Use:
> >>
> >>    pyang -f -tree --tree-line-length 69 ...
> >>
> >> to fit RFCs.
> >>
> >>
> >> /martin
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> netmod mailing list
> >> netmod@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >> .
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to