Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:13:40AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> I do not agree that config true/false just means read write and I > certainly do not want semantics of statements to be changed. +1 [...] > > BTW, we use rw/ro in tree diagrams. > > Which is a mis-nomer (tree diagrams were inherited from the SNMP world > and somehow the rw/ro distinction was kept even though it is > technically wrong). Correct. Nowadays we are using ct vs. cf, so maybe we should use that in the trees. rw vs ro works better visually though - "t" and "f" look fairly similar. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
