Hi Robert, I2RS has a different environment and datastore framework than NETCONF. NETCONF uses a different datastore framework compared to RESTCONF.
DS conceptual model describes an overall picture and defines how it could like. Such a concept providing the basis for many environments cannot be standardized. Protocol WGs are in charge to choose a consistent subset out of the DS conceptual model and standardize the usage of these DSs as part of the protocol specification. BR, Mehmet > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Wilton [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 3:04 PM > To: Mehmet Ersue <mer...@gmail.com>; 'Lou Berger' <lber...@labn.net>; > 'Juergen Schoenwaelder' <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal > > Hi, > > Would 7950bis be allowed to have a normative reference to an Informational > RFC that defined the YANG datastores? > > If we did a 7950bis document (and it isn't clear that one is actually required to > support the revised datastores draft) then does that mean we would also > need to have a new version of YANG? > > That would potentially seem like a backwards step. Also what would it mean > for an implementation that is aware of the new datastores but is using a mix > of YANG modules with different versions? > > I don't understand why the revised datastores draft should not be standards > track once the various appendices have been moved out, noting that they > are really only in the one draft at this stage because it seemed like that would > make it easier for folks to review and comment on. > > Is the only issue here which WG the draft is being worked on? > > Thanks, > Rob > > > On 17/03/2017 13:22, Mehmet Ersue wrote: > > I think YANG identities should be standardized with 7950bis. > > > > Mehmet > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net] > >> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 12:28 PM > >> To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>; > >> Mehmet Ersue <mer...@gmail.com> > >> Cc: 'Kent Watsen' <kwat...@juniper.net>; netmod@ietf.org > >> Subject: Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal > >> > >> Juergen, > >> > >> Thank you for the input. I think your point highlights how the > >> technical contents of a document drives the intended status of a > document. > >> > >> Lou > >> > >> PS as a reminder to all, intended status of documents is *not* > >> typically included in charters and are not included in the distributed > version. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On March 16, 2017 2:44:53 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder > >> <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Mehmet Ersue wrote: > >>> > >>>> That said different people including Netconf WG co-chairs think the > >>>> DS concept document is Informational in nature and should be > >>>> published as > >> an > >>>> Informational concept to be used in and adopted for the needs in > > diverse > >>>> protocol WGs. This is as I think also important to avoid an > >>>> overlapping between NETCONF and NETMOD charters. > >>> The current datastore draft includes concrete YANG idenity > >>> definitions for datastores and origins and these definitions better > >>> be standards track. > >>> > >>> /js > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > >>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > >>> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > . > > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
